sábado, 28 de febrero de 2009

Dreams Coming True

(EN ESPAÑOL MAS ABAJO)

After 36 years of civil war and a wrecked economy, Guatemala needed to find a way to recapture the optimism of its youth. This paper explains how Franklin Covey consultants, together with the Ministry of Education, taught 7 Habits to 2,500 school teachers in all public and private schools in the country. Eventually 1 million youth will be influenced by the principles embedded in the 7 Habits. Our good friend Marta Sánchez was very directly involved and we shall be bringing María del Carmen Aceña, Minister of Education responsible of the programme and Marta to Chile shortly to explore opportunities to share the experience with Chilean educators.
To read the full article click here:

To See Video Click Below :

La Situación

Por 36 años, Guatemala, la tierra de la gran civilización Maya, sufrió los estragos de una guerra civil. Pelotones de fusilamiento, masacres en las villas y batallas entre el gobierno y grupos guerrilleros dejaron 100.000 muertos y la economía en ruinas. Pobreza, corrupción y desconfianza en las instituciones a cargo eran evidentes en todas partes. Finalmente, en el año 1996, en una acuerdo de paz gestado por las Naciones Unidas, las partes beligerantes rindieron sus armas. Guatemala ahora tenía una segunda oportunidad para el progreso.

El Desafío

Pero los cuarenta años de guerra causaron una pérdida inestimable: el optimismo dentro de la juventud. Creciendo en medio del temor, la gente joven sólo deseaba que se los dejara tranquilos. La apatía reinaba entre ellos y la esperanza, visiones y sueños parecían ser relevantes tan sólo para las clases altas. En el año 2003, María del Carmen Aceña, la recién nombrada Ministra de Educación en el gabinete de Óscar Berger, comenzó a visitar algunos colegios. Después de entrevistar a profesores, estudiantes y padres con alarma de dio cuenta que nadie se refería al futuro, ni al de ellos ni al de Guatemala. Considerando que el promedio de vida de la población Guatemalteca era de 18 años, donde más de un 40% era menor de 14 María del Carmen Aceña sabía que si la juventud no tenía esperanzas, Guatemala tampoco las tendría.

Por medio de una profesora rural Brasilera, la Señora ministra supo de un programa innovador que enseñaba a los estudiantes a soñar, a crear y a establecer una declaración de misión personal para ellos y para el país. Su deseo fue el poder implementar este programa a nivel nacional, pero¿cómo? ¿Cómo poder sobrepasar la inercia y la desconfianza por parte de los profesores, la apatía de los estudiantes y la inflexible infraestructura política? ¿Cómo poder introducir nuevas ideas al sistema educativo de toda la nación?

Para leer el artìculo completo y/o ver el video respectivo haga click aquí:
http://franklincoveyresearch.org/documents/textsearch?criteria=GUATEMALA

Esperamos traer a Marta Sánchez, una de las consultoras de Franklin Covey más involucradas en este programa a Chile muy pronto. Además, contaremos con la presencia de María del Carmen Aceña con quienes buscaremos oportunidades de compartir y apalancar esta experiencia con educadores chilenos.
Publicado por EQUIPO DE CHILE en 17:07 0 comentarios

A picture is worth a thousand words


See Below for English

MICARE MINA DE CARBON EN MEXICO (PIEDRAS NEGRAS)

Este video les explicará, mejor que mil palabras, varias de las razones por las que tomé la decisión de unirme con Franklin Covey para relanzar el proyecto en Chile. El proyecto educacional (ver "Dreams Coming True") es otro.

Estaremos programando algunas sesiones especiales durante Abril para darles a miembros de nuestro equipo local más experiencia en la entrega de este contenido en el mercado nacional.

Cualquier persona que desee asistir, puede hacerlo, a un precio muy especial, contactándose directamente a:
pray@franklincoveyla.com.

Los programas de Franklin Covey son un excelente complemento a "Conversaciones Cruciales". Sigo colaborando con Boyden y Vital Smarts para estos efectos.


ENGLISH

For those of you who are still wondering why I moved back to Franklin Covey - take a look at this video about the Micare Coal Mine in Mexico which will save a lot of explanations. The stuff they are doing with "4 Disciplines" and xQ as well as with the new versions of Seven Habits is having a profound effect on productivity, safety and bottom line.


We shall be programming some special sessions during April to give members of our local team some more experience in delivering new workshop content. Anyone interested in attending these programme at very special rate can contact me directly on: pray@franklincoveyla.com.

The Franklin Covey content is a tremendous complement to the Vital Smarts programmes and I shall be available to provide support to clients of Boyden and Vital Smarts for the Crucial Conversations workshops in the forseeable future.

sábado, 7 de febrero de 2009

FRANKLIN COVEY - RELOADED !

Acuerdos en Mexico













En la foto; Roberto Schüler, Bill Beeson, Jose Luis Candela, Philip Ray, Thelma Aguiire, Guillermo Ganem, Sofia Soccorro y Ricardo Acevedo con el Director de Capital Humano, Ovidio Guillén y queridas amigas Marta Sanchez y Barbara Hauser, quienes condujeron intensas sesiones de recertificación en los nuevos programas de Franklin Covey en las oficinas de Leadership Technologies en Mexico.

A partir del 9 de enero este año, Roberto Schüler y yo volvimos a la carga con Franklin Covey, acompañados por María Paz Rioseco, formando parte de la red de consultores integrales de Leadership Technologies operando en Chile, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, México, Nicaragua y Panamá.

Durante las próximas semanas espero tener tiempo, a través de este blog, de compartir algunos de los nuevos programas que podemos ofrecer en Chile y nuestros planes para sinergizar con Boyden institute para seguir atendiendo a los clientes de Conversaciones Cruciales y Coaching Transformacional, por lo menos durante un periodo de transición.

Mientras tanto, les invito a la portada de la nueva página web de Franklin Covey que espero les ayudará a entender mis motivos para tomar esta decisión trascendental -
http://www.fcla.com/quienes_1.html

Publicado por EQUIPO DE CHILE en 3:01 0 comentarios

Etiquetas: EN ESPAÑOL, FRANKLIN COVEY LATAN, LEADERSHIP, ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Financial Agility

Financial Agility: The Four Crucial Conversations for Uncertain Economic Times
By VitalSmarts

VitalSmarts surveyed more than 2,000 managers and executives from more than 400 different companies to learn what it takes to be financially agile.

The results were remarkable. We found four moments that happen in every organization that predict with incredible precision how well and how fast an organization responds to economic threats. Those who handled these four moments well were more than five times more likely to respond within days or weeks rather than letting responses drag on for months or even years. Furthermore, those who stepped up to these crucial moments effectively were more than ten times more likely to respond in a way that positioned the company for future success rather than making cuts that ultimately hurt its potential.

The Four Crucial Moments
1. Debate, Dithering and Denial. A crucial moment when the team is confronted with financial data that may or may not signal a crisis. Teams that are unable to discuss their differences effectively can delay action for weeks or even months. On the other hand, teams that are able to discuss disagreements about the urgency of a financial issue are twice as likely to act on it within hours or days, and, as a result, are nine times more likely to resolve issues.
2. Undiscussables. In this crucial moment, teams are hampered by the fact that some of the biggest opportunities for adjustment aren’t “politically correct” to discuss. More than three‐fourths of the leaders cite times when the biggest barriers to cost savings were politically sensitive cultural practices; even more cite times when the barriers were leaders’ pet policies or topics. More than half report that the inability to address these prickly issues delayed their response by weeks or months and more than a third said the entire effort was derailed by these taboos. On the other hand, about one‐fourth of managers were able to bring up these sensitive issues and were four and a half times more likely to act on the financial crisis within days instead of weeks or months; and nearly five times more likely to resolve it.

3. Silent Collusion. This crucial moment happens when decisions have been made, a plan has been put in place, and predictably, some team members go back on their agreements and when this happens, 89 percent of their peers and 73 percent of their bosses let them get away with it. Without this accountability, 85 percent of these teams end up off plan. Teams that hold each other accountable for commitments related to the financial crisis are six and
half times more likely to take effective action quickly. However, teams that fail to hold each other accountable are seven times more likely to have their boss pull the responsibility out of their hands.

4. Irrational Slashing. The final crucial moment is a result of failure to address the previous three. Senior leaders see (or simply expect) denial, avoidance, and collusion. They don’t trust their reports to make the hard calls, and they fully expect disingenuous support from the organization. In this crucial moment, when leaders are driven by mistrust, they can either talk it out or act out. Our study showed that fewer than 29 percent of leaders confront the trust issue head on. Rather than talking, they act out by demanding across‐the‐board cuts rather than intelligent reductions.
Leaders who exclude the team instead of confronting their actions are nearly three times more likely to undermine their own purpose by either undercutting their mission, making ill‐advised cuts, or resorting to uniform across‐the‐board cuts rather than implement a more tailored approach.

What Leaders Can do to Create Financially Agile Teams
Our agile teams are 250 percent more likely to say they “may miss a few opportunities, but generally do okay.” Our less agile teams are 360 percent more likely to say they miss hundreds of thousands, millions, or tens of millions of dollars in lost opportunities. So here’s what leaders can do to take control:
1. Model and Teach Dialogue Skills. Leaders must overtly foster the dialogue skills required to address these four crucial conversations. In the best organizations, leaders make sure they have the skills, and then take the lead in teaching them to others.

2. Schedule Regular Financial Workouts. These are complex conversations that require dedicated time to play out. Leaders need to commit regular and substantial blocks of time to address these four topics.
3. Publicly sacrifice a sacred cow. Sacrifice breathes life into new values.
4. Support decisions that favor timeliness over perfection. Most managers believe their leaders expect perfection. This tacit belief can create peril in bad times. The most agile leaders accept that their team’s information will never be perfect, help them determine the nature of the uncertainties they face, and encourage them to tailor their decisions to the information they have.
5. Create safe “sub dialogues.” Break the fiscal challenge into discrete problems and assign small crossfunctional
groups of peers to work in a time‐bound way to generate solutions.
Conclusions

The greatest barrier to financial agility is not a lack of intelligence or a lack of time; it’s a lack of focused and unified dialogue. While the need for financial agility is greater today than at any time in recent memory, the capacity to engage an entire organization in candid, timely and wise deliberation pays returns in any season. The present study shows that quality and speed are not at odds. If leaders invest in the skills, time, and support required to allow people to hold the four crucial conversations we outline here, they can generate both profoundly wise (10 times higher quality solutions as judged by their own managers) and surprisingly rapid solutions to their financial challenges.

viernes, 26 de diciembre de 2008

WHAT OBAMA SHOULD DO

Gallup’s chief economist points to the incoming president’s most pressing economic concerns and how to solve them. He explains why policymakers keep dropping the ball and how Barack Obama can avoid doing the same. And he discusses what Obama and business leaders should expect in 2009, some of which is actually good news -- though most of it isn’t.

The first day on the job is always difficult. You must learn new names and new faces, find where they keep the office supplies, then figure out how to do what you were hired for. But imagine doing all that while your organization's financial system is in a nosedive -- its debt increasing by $3.87 billion a day -- and not long ago, many of your highest ranking coworkers actively campaigned to keep you from getting the job.

And that's just the beginning of the situation President-Elect Barack Obama is facing. The list of challenges seems endless: two wars, the ever-present threat of terrorism, and a global economic meltdown, along with myriad other troubles both at home and abroad. By all reports, he's keenly aware that he must hit the ground running on January 20 and has been rapidly assembling his executive team. But, says Gallup Chief Economist Dennis Jacobe, Ph.D., -- and many other economists too -- President Obama's first priority when taking office should be shoring up the U.S. economy.

In the following interview, Dr. Jacobe outlines what he thinks are the incoming president's most pressing economic concerns and how to solve them. He explains why policymakers keep shooting themselves -- and by extension, the taxpayers -- in the foot and how Obama can avoid doing the same. And he discusses what Obama and business leaders should expect in 2009, some of which is actually good news, though the vast majority of it isn't.

Read Full Article

How Employee and Customer Engagement Interact

It’s not quite as simple as “engaged employees create engaged customers.” Here’s why. Customer Engagement Employee Engagement HumanSigma
by John H. Fleming, Ph.D., and Jim Asplund
Excerpted from Human Sigma: Managing the Employee-Customer Encounter
(Gallup Press, November 2007)

Conventional views of the relationships among employee attitudes, customer requirements, and financial performance have emphasized their sequential nature. You can think of these variables as successive links in a chain, in which each variable affects the next to drive some ultimate outcome. This perspective suggests that engaged employees create engaged customers who foster organizational success by delivering positive financial outcomes. Though this perspective has some validity, we believe that it fails to convey the true multidimensional nature of the interdependencies among employee and customer engagement and overall organizational financial performance.

Employee engagement does have a direct and measurable relationship to and impact on customer engagement. But, like the ways in which heart rate and respiration interact to speed life-giving oxygen to all parts of the human body, the ways in which these organizational functions interact to enhance a company's financial vigor are more complex than a simple linear chain of factors. Integrating the vital signs of employee and customer engagement into a single performance construct supported by a single performance measure -- the HumanSigma metric -- provides a comprehensive means to capture and understand this dynamic system. This is because the combined impact of a company's human systems taken together is substantially greater than the effects of the individual systems separately.

Optimize

Our first experience with the power of this dynamic interaction of employee and customer engagement arose quite by accident. Several years ago, we were working with a large retailer to measure and improve its customer and employee relationships. As part of this process, we collected metrics on employee and customer engagement for each store in the chain. Not surprisingly, our analysis found strong linkages to financial performance for each separate measure.

Within the stores, these two performance indicators were reported and acted on independently of one another because, as with most such measurement programs, different functional groups within the company owned the individual parts. The corporate human resources department owned the employee engagement initiative, while store operations owned the customer measurement initiative. As you might expect, there was no formalized interaction between or integration of the two teams responsible for these programs. They rarely, if ever, communicated with one another.

One day, however, the corporate owner of the employee engagement program ran into his counterpart on the customer side at lunch in the company cafeteria. A lively discussion about the two programs ensued. It became clear that the top-performing stores were using some best practices that could be transferred to stores where employee and customer engagement were gaining considerably less traction.

With the best principles of the service-profit chain in mind, the two program owners decided that it might be interesting to compare notes on which stores were the best on each performance indicator. After all, if the sequential service-profit chain model was correct, we would expect there to be considerable overlap between the two groups of best-performing stores.

To perform the analysis, we first identified the 10 highest and 10 lowest performing stores based on their success in engaging employees. We then identified the 10 highest and 10 lowest performing stores based on their success in creating customer engagement. Our working assumption, given the demonstrated statistical linkages between employee and customer engagement, was that some of the top performers in creating employee engagement would also be among the group of top performers in developing engaged customers. Unfortunately, we were wrong: Just one store appeared on both lists. Somewhat nonplussed, we went back to the data in search of an explanation.

As we began to work through the implications of these findings, we made an intriguing discovery. Stores that performed well (those that scored in the top 50% of all stores on the measure) in employee and customer engagement -- even though they may not have had the highest scores on either metric -- tended to deliver considerably better financial results than those that scored poorly on the two measures. Furthermore, stores that performed well on both measures also outperformed those that scored high on one but not the other of these metrics.

Just as respiration and heart rate combine to efficiently and effectively deliver life-giving oxygen and nutrients to the entire human body, customer and employee engagement interact to promote an enhanced level of financial vigor throughout the organization. This relationship is depicted graphically by plotting individual stores' scores on these metrics along two axes representing local employee and customer engagement scores, with each dot representing an individual store in the chain. (See the graphic "Optimized.") By looking at the "scatter" of the points, it's easy to see the considerable variation in performance on employee and customer engagement at the local level.

Our subsequent research has confirmed that this pattern holds true not just for the large, multi-store retailer in this example, but also for companies of different sizes and in various industries. When viewed from the perspective of local business unit performance, customer and employee engagement . . . potentiate one another, creating the opportunity for accelerated improvement and growth of overall financial performance.

John H. Fleming, Ph.D., is Principal and Chief Scientist -- Customer Engagement and HumanSigma for Gallup. He is coauthor of Human Sigma: Managing the Employee-Customer Encounter (Gallup Press, November 2007).
Learn More >>
Jim Asplund is Chief Scientist, Strengths-Based Development and Principal, Performance Impact Consulting with Gallup. He is coathor of Human Sigma: Managing the Employee-Customer Encounter (Gallup Press, November 2007).

How The Ritz-Carlton Manages the Mystique

GALLUP Management Journal
(click here for original article)

11 December 2008
by Jennifer Robison. Senior Editor for the Gallup Management Journal.

The luxury brand uses hard data on employee and customer engagement to create its image and ambience -- and to drive measurable results

Joanne Hanna recently had the pleasure of being a Ritz-Carlton guest, but only after the pain of a bad experience she had flying -- crammed into coach -- in December. "I had to get to a conference in New York, but my flights were delayed over and over. I arrived seven hours later than I meant to, and if I never see O'Hare airport again, it'll be too soon," she says. That delay meant that she missed all her meetings and had time only to check into her room, change, and race to the conference's opening-night dinner.

"The gentleman who escorted me to my room at The Ritz-Carlton asked how my day was, and I told him, the poor guy," says Hanna. "He said he'd be happy to book me into the spa, or send up a masseuse, or even have a rose-petal bath drawn for me, and I'd have loved all of that. But there was no time." So he told Hanna to wait a moment, and then he returned with a scented candle. "I was so touched, I was speechless -- it was so thoughtful and helpful, like something a friend would do," says Hanna. "So I told the people at the desk. And now whenever I check into a Ritz-Carlton, there's a candle waiting for me."

Perhaps any hotel employee could figure out that a tired and frazzled guest could use a little help. And maybe any hotel company with a global database could keep track of a candle-loving customer. But making sure that every employee notices, cares, thinks, and acts as thoughtfully as the one who served Hanna -- well, that takes something special.

The Ritz-Carlton calls that something special "The Ritz-Carlton Mystique." It's a way of conceptualizing the brand's image and the ambience of each of the company's more than 70 worldwide locations. "Mystique" sounds enigmatic, but it's achieved through the most straightforward of methods: extremely close attention to performance data collection and a broad educational platform to deliver the findings.

Of course, all companies watch standard business measures and train employees. But The Ritz-Carlton watches things that most companies ignore, then uses what they learn in a unique way to create ongoing, top-to-bottom learning. "What we get from the data is essential," says John Timmerman, The Ritz-Carlton's vice president of operations. "Everything we learn we use to set strategies, and every strategy is communicated to our people. That learning environment is how we stay agile in an ever-changing world."

Beyond the data


Agility from education is a complex thing. A company has to determine what data to collect and how to collect it, but it also has to ascertain what to do with it. Get any of those things wrong, and the company trips over its own feet. So The Ritz-Carlton concentrates solely -- but obsessively -- on the factors that support the iconic brand.

"We really wanted to make sure that we not only had a great company but that we also had a sustainable company," says Timmerman. "So we started to benchmark different business models. We had to have the right outcome measures, so we developed certain business priority measurements. We call them our key success factors."


The factors are: mystique, employee engagement, customer engagement, product service excellence, community involvement, and financial performance. Most companies start with the financials, but The Ritz-Carlton finishes with them. "Financial performance is a result of the other metrics -- our key success factors," Timmerman says. "Everything else is a diagnostic metric."


The key success factors are the business priorities, and within those factors, The Ritz-Carlton reports on absolutely everything -- from the general morale of the restaurant staff in Bahrain to the number of scuffs on an elevator door in New York. Every day, the company's staff determines whether they're meeting the key success factors -- and if not, what needs to change.
Thus, each location and every one of The Ritz-Carlton's more than 38,000 employees turn in a river of quantitative and qualitative data points. Those bits of data, filtered by the requirements of the key success factors, are examined to give the company real-time information that it uses to set and evaluate the business priority measurements that make up the key success factors. It's a feedback loop of current information, starting and ending with the priorities.


"When executives focus on the mechanics, they miss the communication," says Timmerman. The key success factors feedback loop provides the communication that prevents The Ritz-Carlton's service from being mechanical -- and keeps it personal, for every person in every location every day.


How they strategize


The Ritz-Carlton starts with a flood of data, turns it into a powerful strategy, then targets specific actions to obtain its key success factors. But creating the right strategy to achieve the factors takes as much evaluation as analyzing the data in the first place.


First, The Ritz-Carlton defines the priorities that make up the success factors so that they're actionable and applicable to all employees. To draft the actions, a cross-functional team -- including senior corporate leaders, field representatives such as human resources managers, and rank and file employees -- reviews the plan and contributes insights. The company also uses the data to perform a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to adjust to new information.


"We look at where we want to be versus where we are today -- and where we see the trends on the horizon," says Timmerman. "Then we frame the key success factors. Then we ask for input with the SWOT process. It's a very defined process because it's our opinion that if you can't define it, you can't control it, you can't measure it, and you can't improve it."


The input of frontline staff -- the people who check guests in, serve food, and occasionally present scented candles -- into the SWOT process is crucial. Their insights are loaded into a global database so leaders can identify macro-level themes, market specifics, individual functions, and even corporate blind spots. As a result, the ladies and gentlemen, as all employees of The Ritz-Carlton are called, feel integrally involved in the business.


"For us, [integrating employee feedback into the process is the] true success because employees are personally engaged, they're fulfilled, they understand their contribution, and we're maximizing their talents," says Timmerman. "Involving [employees] in the SWOT process increases their engagement. And in my opinion, employee engagement measurements are a barometer of leadership effectiveness."


Once the company has determined the actions for achieving its success factors, the next step is actually putting them into action. That's the education factor.


How it works


A strategic plan will achieve its goals only if it's understood. And no plan will achieve its ends if it isn't measured and monitored. So, before long-range plans are put in place, The Ritz-Carlton goes to great -- some might say extreme -- lengths to teach and learn from employees. "To be agile in any marketplace, especially one that changes as rapidly as ours," says Timmerman, "means being a learning organization."


The Ritz-Carlton never misses an opportunity to teach. All new employees take part in a two-day cultural orientation before they start their jobs. Then, they are certified after the first 21 days and annually thereafter to ensure that they are delivering brand standards. Every employee in every location takes part in a daily pre-shift meeting in which actions, events, issues, and most importantly, The Ritz-Carlton philosophy, are discussed. In this way, no one is left in the dark about what a priority means -- and everyone understands his or her role in shaping it. "That helps us all adjust to changes," says Timmerman. "And change is constant."

A byproduct of daily learning is that the ladies and gentlemen who actually deal with guests are reminded to, coached on how to, and have a method for relaying customers' faint signals. Even the most subtle guest reactions are noticed and fed into the river of data that is distilled into the business priorities. As a result, the hotel can pick up on information that might have been easily missed and have a built-in plan for delivering that knowledge to others.


Furthermore, every hotel, function, and division has access to the key success factors as well as very specific revenue and profitability measures. Thus, every day, those ladies and gentlemen can see how well they're performing against their targets, each of which rolls up to the company metrics. "So what you have is complete alignment, [and employees can see how] all the key success factors that are at thirty thousand feet translate down to ground level," says Timmerman.


Yet none of these approaches are very long term. Through trial and error, The Ritz-Carlton realized that unless the issue involves a capital improvement, action items should be designed to be accomplished within 90 days. Furthermore, having learned in the strategy evaluation process that hotels do very well when they focus their attention on just a few things, The Ritz-Carlton makes sure every business unit has no more than three priorities.


"[Any objective] longer than ninety days turns into ongoing committees that drink coffee and produce meeting minutes but not a lot of results. And once you go beyond the top three priorities, you start to really diffuse your resources, your bandwidth," says Timmerman. So the company set a mandate that every employee must work on something to improve customer, employee, or financial outcomes, with visible results within 90 days.


Engaging employees
"At the end of the day, our bottom line is in the hands of our front line," Timmerman says, which is why the company is meticulous in hiring and developing its staff. The Ritz-Carlton aims to hire only the very best of the very best -- they select just 1 out of every 20 applicants, and that's after applicants are pre-screened for job requirements.

But fit to role is only part of the employee equation. The other is employee engagement, because engagement is the cornerstone of every Ritz-Carlton success factor. Employee engagement first came to the company's attention because of its correlation to performance measures that have profit consequences; Gallup research has shown that hotels with increased employee engagement scores have lower management turnover, fewer safety incidents, and higher profitability and productivity. (See "Feedback for Real" in the "See Also" area on this page.)

The Ritz-Carlton has conducted employee satisfaction measurements for years because it understood the crucial role that employees play in satisfying guests. But there's a big difference between engagement and satisfaction, so the company began using Gallup's Q12 employee engagement metric in 2006.

The Ritz-Carlton has an extraordinary number of engaged workers, with an overall engagement ranking in the upper quartile when compared to all the workgroups Gallup has studied. And its employee turnover is low enough to be legendary: a mere 18% compared to the luxury-hotel industry average of 158% for line-level workers, 136% for supervisors, and 129% for managers. "We like turnover to be between fifteen and eighteen percent," says Timmerman, "because fresh voices are valuable too."


Engaging guests


The other side of the employee engagement coin is customer engagement. Like employee engagement, customer engagement has strong linkages to important profit outcomes: Gallup research has shown that fully engaged customers deliver a 23% premium over average customers in share of wallet, profitability, revenue, and relationship growth. (See "Manage Your Human Sigma" in the "See Also" area on this page.)
When it first measured customer engagement in 2004, The Ritz-Carlton scored above the 80th percentile against business-to-consumer companies in Gallup's customer engagement database. For most companies, this would be an outstanding result, but outstanding wasn't good enough for The Ritz-Carlton -- or, frankly, for the extremely selective luxury hotel market. So the hotelier used what it learned from the success factor feedback loop to teach the ladies and gentlemen to provide the perfect, and perfectly subjective, engaging experiences. And it worked: The Ritz-Carlton's overall customer engagement score now ranks above the 90th percentile.

HumanSigma


But a few years ago, The Ritz-Carlton stopped managing customer and employee engagement separately. The company understood the dynamics and profit potential of employee engagement and customer engagement, which is why it made each a key success factor. But the performance potential of managing both factors holistically -- a process Gallup calls HumanSigma -- caused the company to reconsider its approach. "Our employee and customer engagement scores are as important as our financial data," says Timmerman.

Gallup research shows that companies that score above the 50th percentile on either employee or customer engagement tend to deliver 70% higher financial results than companies that score poorly on both measures. But companies that score above the 50th percentile on both employee and customer engagement measures outperform companies below the 50th percentile on both measures by 240%. (See "How Employee and Customer Engagement Interact" in the "See Also" area on this page.)


That's a significant performance differential, so The Ritz-Carlton leaves little to chance regarding HumanSigma. Senior leaders incorporate HumanSigma targets into their corporate strategy and action plan, and they review those targets like they review sales and financial results. "We wanted employee and customer engagement to have the same importance as sales, marketing, and financial goals, so we made it part of the senior leadership agenda," says Timmerman. "We integrate that data into our leadership performance profile, so we look at customer relationship management as part of the leadership metrics. That way, employee and customer engagement really get traction."


Candles

So leaders carefully track HumanSigma, which personally affects individual employees, so that they can perform according to the business priority measures, thus ensuring the key success factors, which maintain the world-famous brand. And all of this changes a little bit, every day, to fit the needs of customers.


It's mind-bogglingly complex, but the end result is quite simple. One cold day in December, an exhausted traveler's day was transformed by the gift of a candle from a thoughtful employee. That candle required the compassion of a single employee, but was predicted on millions of data points. That's the quintessence of business agility.

And though that candle cost very little, it's worth a fortune. Hanna was enchanted by The Ritz-Carlton Mystique, as are all people. But that candle caught her at a deeply emotional level, making her a passionately engaged customer. The hotel can count on getting all of her future business, which means several thousand dollars of extra revenue, assuming she remains as engaged as she is today (which, she says, is "a pretty safe bet").

If even a tenth of its guests experience the same sort of magic that Hanna felt, the company's careful data analysis will pay for itself. If a quarter of them do, The Ritz-Carlton's commitment to engagement will return a magical experience for its guests -- and an enormously healthy return on investment to the company.

Datos Profesionales